This drives me nuts. According to this New York Times story, a woman got accursed from Animal Care & Ascendancy of NYC for demography and publishing beautiful photos of dogs about to get euthanized, acquisitive that anyone would accept them.
Her name is Emily Tanen. She was accursed endure May afterwards publishing beautiful dog images taken with her claimed $1500 Nikon DSLR camera instead of the ACCNY-issued cheapo webcam. Her snaps are great. Beautiful, in fact, assuming the dogs at their cutest. You can see the aberration amid the photos taken by ACCNY—the "largest pet alignment in the northeast rescuing about 40,000 animals anniversary year"—and chastening on the angel above.
Yes, chastening are the ones on the bottom. The ones that don't blot cat balls. They in fact accomplish me wish to accompany the dogs home. The ones on top accomplish me anticipate they are flea-ridden dogs about to get deadened in the home of a colorblind able addict. You can see more of her photos here.
According to Animal Care & Ascendancy of NYC, Tanen was accursed because she was demography photos adjoin the guidelines of the organization. ACCNY's website photo guidelines say that no bodies should arise in the photographs because "it looks like the animals accept already been adopted."
So stupid. That doesn't accomplish any sense. It's in fact the contrary. If you see a blessed dog interacting with humans, you would be added absorbed to adopt, as Mark Ross credibility out. Mark, a 66-year-old artist and advance at ACCNY, did the aforementioned as Emily but appear his photos in his own Facebook page. He was accursed afterwards he banned to yield the pictures down. Now he's publishing a book with the dog portraits.
So: woman with a acceptable affection takes photos to accomplish animals feel beautiful and snuggly. People like photos. People accept dogs. Woman gets fired.
I accept that any alignment has the appropriate to ascendancy aggregate beneath its command. And I accept that Emily was warned. And I can even accept why the bozos active the ACCNY didn't change their brainless action instead for battlefront her. But even compassionate all this, battlefront anyone who is finer accretion the amount of acceptance of these dogs is authentic imbecility.
To see added examples of this imbecility, apprehend the abounding story. [New York Times]
Disclaimer: Anna Jane Grossman—who wrote the NYT article—is a Gizmodo contributor. Anna Jane is aswell the columnist of The Dogs, a blog committed to dogs (you estimated it) and added animals.
Four Old Gadgets We Love (and Four We Hate)Four Old Gadgets We Love (and Four We Hate)Four Old Gadgets We Love (and Four We Hate)
Anna Jane Grossman is the columnist of Obsolete: An Encyclopedia of Once-Common Things Passing Us By.…Read moreRead on
No hay comentarios :